TV Lies. So do newspapers, magazines, radio....
Here's some interesting 9/11 discussion:
Why did a 3rd skyscraper that was NOT hit inexplicably collapse? Building 7 was not hit by an airplane, had no significant fire, was 47 stories high and constructed of steel. Yet at 1730 - it fell right down on itself into a small pile of rubble 'just like' a controlled demolition. FEMA has said the fire specifics, and the buildings collapse remain unknown.
Larry Silverstein, the lease owner, who collected insurance of 7 BILLION dollars - is on tape saying he ordered people to "pull it", that is to destroy it.
In October of 2001, the magazine 'Scientific America' told us that "They just don't build them as tough as the world trade center".
It's interesting that Meridian Plaza in Phillidelphia burned for 19 hours yet never collapsed. How could the WTC South Tower fall, after burning less than ONE hour? The North Tower fell after only 2 hours.
How could the 'Jet Fuel' have caused the collapse, when FEMA and other governmental agencies have stated that most of the jet fuel was gone in the original fire ball?
AND - how could the fires have cause the collapse at all since recent fire tests by Cardington (Structural Fire Engineering), found that a steel building survived fires in experiments with extreme temperatures BEYOND THE RANGE possible with jet fuel?
The black smoke coming from the buildings means the fire was oxygen starved, and therefore wasn't reaching it's max temp of 1,800 F, and steel melts at a much higher temp of 2,500 F , nearly 700 degrees hotter than the maximum temp of the fire. How did clean up crews find melted steel in the basements?
How could days later - NASA sattelite images show hot spots in the buildings that still exceeded the maximum temperatures possible?
Explosives such as C4, create temps exceeding 3,000 F, which would easily melt steel.
Why did 'Fire Engineering' magazine, tell us that "No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire". And that the WTC investigation was a "half-baked farce".
Why was all the important evidence, (structures, building etc.) illegaly destroyed? Some before the 'investigation' even began?
How could the airliners have caused collapse, when wind gusts from storms have at times been greater than those of the airliners? Neither tower was bent, nor did they creak or groan at any time.
How could the towers collapse at the max speed of gravity? Each floor hit should have slowed the fall. This could not have happened without explosives placed inside the structure.
How could the concrete, encased in a steel frame pan, with two layers of carpeted over it, riveted inside columns of steel beams, welded together in a network with steel bands be pulverized?
How could steel beams, and clouds of finely pulverized concrete come shooting out of the buildings at 100's of mph, travelling all the way to Jersey?
This is only possible with explosives.
The 9/11 commission states that the buildings fell, because the bolts, rivets and steel framework were weakend by the fire. If so - then how could the concrete be pulverized, and ejected at high speed, since the force required to do that, is higher than the force needed to sheer the steel bolts and rivets?
How could the towers fall straight down, when the dammage and resulting fires were only to one corner, two sides? Only the tops then should have fallen, and they should have fallen over, and not straight down.
In fact, the top of one tower DID fall over onto building 4, so there was no building weight to crush the floors below. So what caused the collapse of those floors?
How could a hijacker find, and hit the pentagon - who's flight instructor said: "I'm still to this day amazed that he could have flown into the Pentagon. He could not fly at all. How could a pilot this bad, have the flight controllers comment: "The steep turn was so smooth, it's clear there was no fight for control going on. The complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had better flying skills than many investigators believed".
Why did NORAD fail to stop the attackers 4 times that day? 3 times AFTER they knew the planes were supposedly hijacked and intent on mass murder.
How could this happen when NORAD had succesfully intercepted of course, and suspected hijackings SIXTY SEVEN times in the year prior to 9/11?
On October 25, 1999, at 9:33 a.m. air traffic controllers in Florida lost touch with a Learjet carrying golfer Payne Stewart and several companions after it left Orlando headed for Dallas, Texas. Nineteen minutes after Air Traffic Control realized something was wrong, one or more US Air Force fighter jets were already on top of the situation, in the air, close to the Learjet.
Why did Condi Rice lie, and say that the US had no idea that terrorists would use hijacked airliners, when Dick Chaney was conducting war games specifically about hijacked war games on 9/11? There's even more going on with the command centers they magically had set up around the WTC's.
Why were airforce planes diverted from intercepting the real hijacked airplanes?
Isn't it too much of a coincidence that the four planes had only 20 to 50% of their seats filled, when ALL OTHER transcontinental flights had 70 to 90% of their seats occupied. Just these exact four were all below 50%. Government officials were also told not to fly, and to stay away from New York that day.
Just like the London bombings, when officials were diverted away from the tunnels, and buildings above them.
Former Geman defence minister has gone public saying that the US government was the only ones who could carry out this job.
Many former Reagan and Bush staff have quit their posts, or gone public becuase the whole of 9/11 was an inside job. Physics professors, mining school heads, underwriting laboratories have all said the official story was a fraud. The engineers are saying it's all a fraud.
Purpose, to get the people to willingly give away their freedoms so they feel safe.
That's all for now.